Smart Balance Sustainability Report 2012
|Company||Smart Balance, Inc|
|Filer||California State Teachers' Retirement System|
|Sector||Food and Beverage|
|Resolved Clause Summary||Sustainability report|
|Supporting Memo||Download PDF|
We believe that sustainability reporting on environmental, social and governance (ESG) business practices makes a company more responsive to the global business environment, an environment with finite natural resources, evolving legislation, and increasing public expectations of corporate behavior. Reporting also helps companies better integrate and gain strategic value from their existing corporate social responsibility efforts, improve company-wide communications, and publicize innovative practices.
Increasingly, companies are identifying sustainability factors relevant to their business and addressing them strategically through sustainability programs and reports. According to a 2011 KPMG report (Corporate Sustainability: A Progress Report), 62% of companies surveyed (378 global companies) have sustainability strategies in place. According to the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), in 2010, 1,863 organizations prepared sustainability reports, a 23 percent increase from the year prior.
Evidence linking sustainability consideration and value creation is now being seen. An October, 2010 report from Thomson Reuters (ESG and Earnings Performance) concluded that, “U.S. companies with stronger ESG scores consistently beat earnings estimates more frequently than those with lower scores.” A July 2011 white paper by RCM (Sustainability: opportunity or opportunity cost) opined that, “investors could have added 1.6 percent a year over just less than five years to their investment returns by allocating to portfolios that invest in companies with above-average ESG ratings.” And according to an October 4, 2011 report from Goldman Sachs (Why ESG matters), “Firms with leading ESG scores tend to generate higher and more durable returns on capital than sector peers.”
According to Smart Balance’s 2010 annual report, the Company acknowledges that it faces a variety of ESG-related risks that could materially affect its financial condition and operating results, including regulatory, labor, supply chain, environmental, and reputational risk. For example, on page 16 of this report, it states, “Decreased agricultural productivity in certain regions as a result of changing weather patterns could limit availability or increase the cost of key agricultural commodities. We are a large user of palm oil and could be affected by sustainability issues related to rain forests and the impact this would have on palm oil production.”
Smart Balance has not provided adequate disclosure, whether in public filings, on its website, or through a report, that discusses the Company’s response to ESG-related issues. Without this disclosure, shareholders, investors and analysts cannot ascertain whether Smart Balance is properly managing its ESG exposure, and this could adversely affect the value of our Company.
Shareholders request that the Board of Directors issue a sustainability report describing the company’s short- and long-term responses to ESG-related issues. The requested sustainability report should include a company-wide review of the policies, practices, and metrics related to ESG performance. The report should be prepared at reasonable cost, omitting proprietary information, and made available to shareholders by December 31, 2012.