INCR Members in Action
Protecting Clean Air Standards
In April 2011, four amendments to block the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from regulating greenhouse gases failed in the Senate days after INCR member Calvert Asset Management delivered a letter signed by 44 investors representing $546 billion in assets supporting the EPA's authority to regulate carbon emissions. The letter is the latest expression of growing investor support for the EPA's regulation of greenhouse gases, which experts say will increase investment in clean energy and generate American jobs.
For more information, read the Ceres report New Jobs-Cleaner Air: Employment Effects under Planned Changes to EPA’s Air Pollution Rules.
Climate Disclosure Requirement
In 2010, through the leadership of Ceres and the Investor Network on Climate Risk (INCR), the Securities and Exchange Commission issued ground-breaking interpretive guidance requiring corporate disclosure of material climate change risks and opportunities. This legally-binding guidance outlines the types of climate-related disclosure publicly-traded companies must provide to investors in financial filings. It is the first economy-wide climate risk disclosure requirement in the world.
INCR also encouraged Canadian securities regulators to issue formal guidance on climate change-related disclosure that companies must provide to investors in their financial filings.
Canada's Oil Sands
INCR members including investors from Asia, Europe and the United States met with regulators and business leaders as well as U.S. and Canadian government officials in an effort to better disclose and manage the far-reaching risks and opportunities from this enormous undertaking.
Read the Ceres report "Canada's Oil Sands: Shrinking Window of Opportunity" for more about the risks of this energy source for investors.
Proposition 23 vs. California's Clean Energy Law
INCR members joined other major investors in issuing a joint statement urging a “No” vote on Proposition 23, the November 2010 California ballot initiative that would halt implementation of the state’s landmark, bipartisan clean energy law.
Investors warned policymakers that passage of Proposition 23 could negatively effect California's economy in terms of job growth, private investment, energy pricing and stability and public health due to air pollution. Proposition 23 failed, resulting in a victory for investors, businesses and the people of California.
|